Reverse sexism is a male lie

Picture taken from the movie Waiting to Exhale 

Of late I have been coming across a lot of accusations that reverse sexism is very much a live and causing a great deal of problems. 

The accusers of this are predominantly white hetro males who often make these accusations from either a men’s rights or fathers rights point of view.

I have always had a big problem with this.  As I have mentioned in previous posts white hetro males are the most privileged of all people on this planet, which begs the question “what rights are they demanding?”

Investigation clearly shows that they are demanding the right to maintain strait white male supremacy and domination, the right to continue raping underage girls, the right to continue to abuse wives and girlfriends and quite a lot more.

These males are claiming that they are now the victims of sexism which is been delivered to them from a feminist dominated society.  I am really curious about this.  When did we become a feminist dominate society?  From what I can see we are still very much under the oppressive male dominated society.

Their idea of reverse sexism is when women dare to stand up to male oppression.  When women say men do not have the right to treat women and girls as property then men immediately accuse these women of been sexist.

So I guess in a male dominated society, men can treat women and girls as they like and that is not sexism, as it is just the man exercising his manly right.  But when a woman resists the horrors of male domination, oh well that is different, clearly she is an evil sexist feminist.

I am really trying to understand reverse sexism.  How can it take place when men still maintain most of the power in today’s world?

While it is certainly true that thanks to our feminist foremothers we women have certainly made progress and obtained some power, but I can assure you, not nearly enough to start discriminating against men in the way that they would have you believe.

By making women look bad the oppressor (men) are able to create the illusion that the oppressed (women) is really the bad apple and needs to be dealt with.

In their drive to educate women and girls about male domination, feminists must make this an important point.  Too often I see the victim getting all the blame, for example when a woman is raped it becomes her fault because clearly she was dressed provocatively or she shouldn’t have been in such a quite part of town by herself etc. 

Reverse sexism is the same thing.  It is blaming the victim; it is making the victim look like the cause of the problem.  And what better way to deflect male sexism towards women if men are able to get everyone to think we are now discriminating against men.

These men who make such accusations will often point to TV commercials that in their opinion are anti-male.  To be quite honest I have not found many of these so called anti-male adverts though I have come across many many adverts that are anti-woman.

But let’s humor the boys and have a look at one of these so called anti male adverts.

The one I would like to look at which attracted a lot of anger from many men is one created for the Australian Cancer Council called Cloakroom.  You may be aware of the women’s anti-cancer fundraising event called “Girl’s Night In” if not and if this topic is of interest to you, you can read-up on them here  http://www.girlsnightin.com.au/

Anyway back to the commercial at hand.

The commercial shows some women arriving at a house laughing and clearly happy to be there, their hostess takes the coat of one of the women and opens a closet.  In the closet we see a man (presumably either her husband or boyfriend) at the bottom of the closet, tied and gagged.  The women who was laughing with her friends when she opens the closet door looks at him with much disappointment as if she has been really let down by him, throws the coat into the closet and then closes the closet door.

The outraged males who complain about this advert are quick to ask how people would feel if the sexes had been reversed.

Well interesting they should ask this because this happens quite often in real life.  Women and girls get horribly abused by husbands, boyfriends and fathers and I have certainly read a lot of articles in which men keep women and girls locked up in closets, basements, car trunks etc.  This after they have beaten them up or raped them.

What makes this commercial amusing is that by looking at the physical size of the woman and the man you know it would not be possible for her to have actually been able to tie him up and lock him in the closet. In real life it would have been the other way around.

In the real world the oppressor oppresses women and girls and locks them in closets and basements, now we have a comical look at how the oppressed has locked the oppressor in the closet, giving him a taste of his own medicine.

The women are happy and laughing because with the evil oppressor locked away they can both have fun without been oppressed and deal with real issue that affect women in this case cancer issues without been belittled or made fun of.

If I had any complaints about this commercial It would have been that I would have liked to have seen more women of colour, especially as cancer affects all women and not just white women.  In fact by using women of colour together with white women it could have been more empowering.

Strait white males have always owned the property and employed women of colour to serve him.  Throughout history white males have been known to rape their female servants and slaves.

Well now the oppressive white male is locked in the closet and the women are now free to be women.

Vintage adverts prove sexism is alive and well

As the year is coming to a close I decided just for the fun of it to go and look at some vintage adverts.  It did not take long before I wish I hadn’t.  I was horrified to discover so many vile sexist demeaning adverts that make women look like stupid little incompetent objects whose only purpose is to serve and be abused by her mighty male.  

Here are a few of some that I found on various different sites.

White male arrogance 

Violence against women and girls is still condoned in a male dominated society

Women are still property in this white male dominated society 

In a male dominated society men are always right and women are always wrong.

What most of them have in common is that in the center is an arrogant sexist white male who thinks he is lord and master while the poor little woman desperately tries to please him in.  

But what concerns me here is that these adverts are called vintage.  Now it is true that this title could well be construed as a correct title, but it does however create the belief that this kind of thing would never be tolerated in today’s society.

In reality that would be a very incorrect assumption as these adverts clearly depict the way males see themselves in relation to women today as much as they did when these ads were first designed.

Male on female abuse and violence is a huge problem and getting worse.  Men today believe it is their right to abuse women as demonstrated in the ad for “Do you still beat your wife.”

So what is the difference between this ad and today’s abuse that women face from men?

Today the world revolves around men and they are always right.  Women are always to blame for everything.  So how is this different to what is been expressed in the “Is a wife to blame if she doesn’t know.” Advert?

Men use and abuse women, they really don’t care much about helping women and when women do need help, well then they are just pathetic and helpless.  In the ad “men are better then women” we see two arrogant white males standing in all their white male glory while a poor woman who obviously can't climb as well as them because she is not a man, desperately tries to keep up with the mighty males.  Not only are these two white males so much better then women they are also too good and awesome to be concerned about the situation that she finds herself in.

So how is this advert different to what we see to day?  Men have no desirer to help women.  The only way women will be liberated from male domination is if they do it themselves.  

Frankly if I were able to redesign the advert, not only would the little incompetent woman successfully get up the mountain but she would also kick those two fucking sexist ass-holes right between the legs and then shove that pick-axe up their sexist white male assess. 

In fact if anyone has any ideas as to how any of these ads should be redesigned I would love to hear your suggestions.  

I find a similar problem with the “Put the finest label on your table” advert.  Here to we see two fucking white sexist arrogant white males who clearly believe that they are the dominant specie by simply being white and male, while the good little wife busies herself in order to ensure that their every need has been met.

I guess according to this advert the only need a woman has is to turn herself into a salve for the mighty male.  After all what other possible reason could a woman have to exist.

I could comment on the other ads and even provide further commentary on the ones that I have already referred to, but I am just too pissed off.  Not only are these adverts horribly demeaning but are still very much a reflection of what women today have to put up with.

It serves as a reminder that there is still so much to do.

Time to “kick Patriarchy in the groin.”

Why does feminism seem to be in permanent slow motion?  It seems that feminisms victories take forever to achieve and when something is finally achieved it just seems that so much time and effort was put in by so few to achieve a couple of bread crumbs.

Is this because many women firmly believe that we have achieved equality and now there is nothing more to achieve?  Is it because women have just thrown in the towel and decided that liberating women from male domination is just too much work and too much of a sacrifice.

If we have truly reached equality why do men still see women as their property and sex objects.  Why do fathers still rape their daughters and murder their wives and girlfriends.

Why do male matters matter and women’s views are totally disregarded.

If standing up to male supremacy is too much of an effort and a sacrifice then how does one explain rape and other horrid forms of sexual, physical and psychological violence that men rain down on women every second of the day on this planet?

Is it because male domination has been around since the dawn of time that women don’t know any better and have just accepted male oppression as a fact of life.

Men have privilege and power and they enjoy every second of it without even considering the effects it has on women and girls.  Life revolves around men, men determine what is right and wrong and everything is defined by male standards.  Women are just property that the male can use and abuse as he sees fit.

Men have no interest in equality.  If they did they could have ensured a proper society where all are treated justly.  But men don’t want this; they don’t want to give up their privilege and power.   

Women need to realize that if they just sit back and accept male abuse it will not go away.  The oppression of women and girls will just get worse.  More women will get raped, more wives and girlfriends will be abused and even murdered, and women will have to deal with more sexism and even racism.

Its time to get feminism fueled up and moving again.  Men don’t want equality so if we sit around talking about equality we will achieve nothing.

Feminism must be about completely destroying male supremacy and privilege.  Feminists need to “kick Patriarchy in the groin.”

Feminism is not about pleasing men.  It’s about realizing who the enemy of women and girls are and dealing effectively with the enemy to ensure that no man will ever be able to inflict any harm be it sexual, physical or psychological on any woman or girl ever again.

Who are the real enemies of feminism?

                             See what happens when we stand as one

A point of frustration for me is the divisions within the feminist movement.  These differences don’t just result in different views and opinions which by itself is perfectly acceptable and often advantages but also result in some horrific in-fighting.  Often I have heard feminists so determined to force their views and ideologies on fellow feminists that the argument turns into a situation where one feminist pours out vile hatred towards the other and often the other returns this hatred in kind.  So much for a constructive argument.

I sometimes wonder who are the real enemies of us feminists.  Is it male domination and supremacy as we always preach or are our biggest enemies fellow feminists?  Based on some of the vicious attackers I have both experienced and witnessed I am inclined to think it is the latter.

Understandably feminists come from all walks of life, with very different experiences.  This is a good thing but then these feminists start expecting feminism and feminists to comply with a whole host of their pre conceived ideas.

Some of the biggest divisions seem to be race, sexual orientation and even religion.

One of the aims of feminism to totally eradicate racism and yet there are such huge divisions between white women and women of colour.  How on earth are these divisions going to bring anything good to feminism?  Understandably, as humans we tend to mix with people who we perceive as similar to us for example white women will tend to mix more with white women and black women will tend to mix more with black women.  This by itself I do not think is a problem.  Feminism is about liberating a women and if a woman is liberated then she can mix with who ever she wants to.

However, let’s not let this division come between us in our quest to destroy male supremacy.  Black women often go off on a tandem that white women are arrogant and could never understand their suffering, as black women have suffered far more then white women. 

With a view like this no wonder there is so much vicious conflict between the races. 

White women have been known to be arrogant and look down on black women.  Under the feminist umbrella white women must realize that all women are of equal value.  No woman is better then the next, but at the same time black women must understand that suffering is relative.  We all experience suffering differently. 

You and I could face the same tragic experience together but it won’t necessarily mean we will experience it the same.  You may recover quickly from it while I may be terribly traumatized by it.

So ladies, stop been arrogant and stop telling other feminists that their suffering is nothing in comparison to yours as this also comes down to arrogance.

Remember, racism is a product of white male supremacy.  White males did not want their supremacy challenged therefore they made a very clever and cunning move by creating racism which clearly caused divisions.

Despite keeping white women oppressed they gave them more privileges then black women thus creating animosity between the two.

They told their white women that non white people were savages and given the chance they would rape and murder white women and only white men could save them from such an evil fate.  Thus white women saw people of colour as dangerous and scary and at the same time saw their oppressor as their saviour

Then there is sexual orientation.  Some women claim that in order to be a true feminist you have to be a lesbian otherwise it means you are sleeping with the enemy.  Other women find it imposable to be a lesbian and feel that blind hatred towards men will only cause greater problems for women. 

All women should be striving for the liberation of women from men.  If you are a lesbian then you strive as a lesbian to liberate women, if you are heterosexual and have no interest in lesbianism then you strive as a heterosexual women to liberate women. 

Ladies, in what holy book does it state that you have to be a lesbian to be a feminist or that only heterosexual women can be feminists?

Your responsibility is to liberate women irrespective of which side of the coin you are on.  And its time to start realizing that the other side is of equal value to your side as it is the same coin.

Talking of holy books, religion also comes up.  It amazes me how many feminists regard Christianity as some evil man made religion to oppress women.  Strange how these very same feminists don’t have much to say about Islam.

If you are going to reject Christianity, just remember that there are a great deal of Christian women in the world who have become Christian by their own free will (remember feminism is about giving the woman the right to choose) these women use their faith to overcome and destroy sexism and racism so who are you to attack them for their beliefs.

If you are going to reject Christianity as un-feminists then does that mean Christian women who are minorities in countries like Pakistan, Egypt, Indonesia must now be rejected.  Eventhough these women are horribly oppressed in their own countries not just because they are women, but also because they are Christian.

Please read this article called “Muslim Extremists in India Attack, Threaten Christian Women” to give you an idea of what Christian women are up against in countries where they are the minority.

http://www.persecution.org/2011/08/07/muslim-extremists-in-india-attack-threaten-christian-women/

If Western feminists are going to ignore something as horrid as this just because these women are Christian then we seriously have fallen off the feminist bus.  Christian women in non-Christian countries need our support and as feminists we should be doing just that.  But instead we go on about how Christianity and feminism don’t go together and while we are having a big Christian debate, these Christian women continue to suffer.

In fact as feminists we need to wake-up and realize that while we are going at each other whether it is about race, sexual orientation, religion or anything else the number of men who rape and murder women is increasing, the number of men who abuse their partners is increasing, the porn and prostitution industry is growing and the men who are involved in sex slave trade are laughing all the way to the bank.

So next time you are either in a bad argument i.e. not a constructive argument (the two are different) with a feminist or are not trying to defuse one remember while you are fighting your sister, some young girl is been raped by her father and you are doing nothing to stop it.

We need to be one collective feminist organization, with our individual personalities.  Being part of a collective does not mean you should lose your individuality but rather it should be strengthened by you looking at yourself and at your strengths and asking yourself “how can I use my strengths and uniqueness to strengthen the feminist organization in is fight to literate women from men.”

Can women have their own space in a male dominated world?

Feminists often speak about women’s spaces.  In a world completely dominated by men it is no surprise that women often find themselves desiring women’s spaces.

In a man’s world a woman is just a piece of property and a fuck toy.  Something to be used and abused as men see fit.

Considering that in man’s world women are always been brought down, it is no surprise that there are many everyday women walking around with very low self esteem.

Women are not only held back by sexist laws, customs etc, but when a woman believes she is just a worthless piece of shit and her main objective in life and purpose for living  is to serve men, then she is not a likely candidate to achieve much in life.  If women are constantly thinking so lowly of themselves, then they certainly won’t be able to pull themselves up to higher standards and achieve what God created them to achieve.

A male dominated society only offers women oppression and depression.

Women need their own spaces, where not only they can discuss female issues with out been run down by men, but also they need these spaces in which they can support each other hold and hold each other up and show that women have so much to offer this world and they can achieve so much and the only thing holding them back is male domination.

As one who firmly believes that women (and feminist men) need to support each other I was rather disappointed when I came across the following article on the MailOnline written by Abul Taher and Brendan Carlin on 30 October 2011.

Quote

The Hattie Cabinet: Harman 'riding roughshod' over Miliband as she launches women-only frontbench team

Harriet Harman was yesterday accused of 'riding roughshod' over Labour leader Ed Miliband after she launched a new bid to boost the power of women Labour MPs.

Ms Harman, Labour's deputy leader, sparked fury among male party colleagues by announcing that the 11 women in the Shadow Cabinet were holding their own meetings.

They said Ms Harman informed the Labour leader of the plan – already being dubbed 'Harriet's Kitchen Cabinet' – at a full Shadow Cabinet meeting earlier this month.

One witness told The Mail on Sunday that towards the end of the meeting, Ms Harman mentioned that the women members would be meeting on their own. The source added: 'The blokes on the Shadow Cabinet just looked at each other as if to say, what the hell is all this about?

'Harriet then said that as the Tories were now losing the women's vote, it was important that we made sure our policies appeal to female voters.

'But even Ed looked a bit surprised and joked, “When are the men going to meet then?” and when nobody laughed, he said, “Sorry, not a great joke.”

'But it really is a load of politically correct, feminist claptrap. She's riding roughshod over Ed.'

When challenged about the meetings, Mr Miliband's office at first said Ms Harman had actually talked about meetings for all female Labour MPs – not just those in the Shadow Cabinet. But later the Labour leader's spokeswoman admitted Ms Harman had announced that women Shadow Cabinet members were about to meet but other female MPs in the party were also invited.

The spokeswoman denied that Ms Harman was dictating to Mr Miliband, saying he had been aware of the all-women gathering and was 'very supportive'.

She added that an earlier women-only event had taken place in the summer while the most recent was held in the Shadow Cabinet room at the Commons last week.

However, since then, The Mail on Sunday has been told that the Labour leader has rebuked his frontbench team over how details of the all-women meetings leaked out.

One source said: 'He told them all off at last week's meeting, saying someone in the room was leaking stuff from what are supposed to be confidential meetings.'

So fierce is Ms Harman's zeal for women's rights that the South London MP, 61, has been given the nickname 'Harriet Harperson' and 'patron saint of equality'.

As the party's deputy leader, she backed a controversial policy of all-women shortlists in Labour target seats at the last General Election.

However, she faced taunts after her husband, ex-union baron Jack Dromey, was selected as Labour candidate for a winnable seat in Birmingham and duly won it.

Ms Harman was told by William Hague: 'Your husband has just gone through an all-women shortlist to be selected. You may not want to recognise marriage in the tax system but you sure do in the political system.'

Last night, one senior male Labour MP who is angry at the formation of the new all-women group said he suspected it was partly a 'front-group' for an eventual leadership bid by the Shadow Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper.

The MP added: 'Of course we've got to appeal to women voters but it's as though the blokes have never met any women, don't know anything about them and don't want to.'

Unquote

I don’t know how most feminists feel about this.  But for me it is a sign that not only do women need their own spaces, but also that men think women’s spaces are stupid and unnecessary and will therefore try and sabotage them.

The reason for this could be because men just don’t care how women feel or they don’t want the oppressed to get together in case they realize just how oppressed they are, that they are worth a lot more then men allow them to think they are and horrors of horrors they may even start a revolution.

Will women get a raw deal in Occupy Wall Street?

Occupy Wall Street has being dominating the news lately and from what I can see it has very little to do with feminism.  The protesters are still trying to define exactly what it is that they want to take away form this protest. But what we can definitely know is that they are protesting the great disparity within the economy.

This at first glance may suggest that the protest takes feminist ideology into account.  Wall Street together with the economy as a whole is virtually entirely in the hands of strait white males.

Personally I see nothing wrong with a person who works hard and reaps great rewards from their hard labour.  

But these strait white males are making fortunes at the misery of so many people.  And what do these mighty white males do with all their money that they have made at the expense of others, do they invest it back into the economy in away that all can benefit?

Not at all, they use it to make themselves more powerful by using it to oppress those who are not welcome into their boys’ club house.  They use it to finance the porn industry and the prostitution industry by making use of porn and prostitutes both locally and abroad.  It would not surprise me if some of these strait white males believed that they were in actual fact investing their money, after all if paying a third world country so that they can rape that country’s young girls is that not supporting a third world country financially?

So at first, yes,

Occupy Wall Street

does seem to uphold feminist principals in that it oppose this kind of tyranny.

Yet when looking at it more closely we see that it is very much represented by males.  This being, despite there being a good deal of women present.  It is the men who are deciding what they want out of this protest.  They are asking themselves, what is best for men. 

Women are suffering tremendously under this economic disaster, yet it seems that only the men are the ones deciding on what is best and you can be sure that when they are making these decisions they are not thinking about feminism, but rather about how it will advance their male privilege and not how it will uplift women.

Just because there are a good number of women present does not mean that their needs are being taken into account.  The fact that there are many women present shows that they do take this seriously, that their needs are just as important as men’s, therefore it is only right that women need to be afforded the same opportunities as men, otherwise women will once again get walked all over in this male dominated world.

Remember feminism is not about trying to deny that men don’t suffer, but rather that women’s suffering is of equal importance to that of men.

Proud to be a man-hater

Lately I have been bombarded with comments and articles clearly pointing out that feminists are nothing short of ugly, hairy man-haters. As the term man-hater is something that gets thrown around constantly in anti-feminist circles, I want to find out what does the term man-hater acutely mean.

To get a definition of the term man-hater we must remember that we are living in a male dominated world by which everything is defined in terms of male supremacy and privilege.

Therefore an attack on male supremacy would already start pushing you in the direction of being a man-hater. Male supremacy delights itself in the likes of rape, porn, prostitution, violence, greed etc. Therefore if a feminist protests rape or porn, she is seen as someone who is attacking the ideals of male supremacy and is therefore branded a man-hater.

The term man-hating is not something new, it has been around for many, many years. When female suffragettes where demanding the right to vote, ugly, hairy man-haters where quite common words to be heard in the sentences and as stand-alone words of many a male.

Today very little has changed, as soon as a woman or girl dares to stand-up to sexism, racism or to even try and suggest that girls and women have rights they are branded man-haters.

In my personal experience I have found many men who use the term man-hater to often associate themselves with the likes of men's and/or fathers rights.

Most MRAs and fathers rights activists are strait white males who have the greatest power and privilege under male supremacy. I guess these privileged assholes resent feminists attacking their special privileges as these privileges keep women and girls in servitude to the mighty white male.

If opposing rape, porn, prostitution, male on female violence, sexism, racism, homophobia etc etc makes a feminist a man-hater, then not only am I a man-hater but also proud to be one.

If you are a feminist and you get accused of being a man-hater by the oppressor it means you are doing a good job. So next time you get called a man-hater or any other nasty term like femiNAZI be proud of it and let it spur you on to become an even more radical man-hater.

White males oppressed???????

I can't help but wonder if the world has gone mad!!!
Why are we forgetting about the rights of the oppressed and becoming so concerned about about our oppressor.

Lately all I have being hearing about, is how oppressed and done in the strait white male is these days.  It seems that the poor white male is getting bashed from every corner and just can't seem to get a break. 
The financial crises appears a great deal in the media and here we constantly hear how it is negatively effecting the white male - I guess women and people of colour were not and are not effected by the crises.

Well, lets look at this a bit more closely.  The strait white male has spent centuries oppressing women and people of colour.  The white male has lived a life of great privilege at the expense of those he oppresses.

Today the strait white male is at the top of the hierarchy, still living with great privilege and still oppressing all people who are not strait white males.

Yet it is this group that we are told is being so oppressed by evil feminists and other like minded people. 

It really irritates me when I have to continuously listing to these oppressers constantly whining about the fact that they may actually lose some of their great privilege. Thus we must feel sorry for the oppressor and become angry at the oppressed, for clearly according to white male logic it is the oppressed who are causing all the problems.

Here is an article written by Vivia Chen on 19 April 2011 called "Point and Shoot"

Quote

I'm beginning to sympathize with hunters in states like Wyoming and Montana who are fed up with animal protectionists. Do packs of wolves that prey on cattle and threaten the livelihood of hardworking, God-fearing ranchers really need protection?
Okay, so I know zilch about wolves and livestock. (I'm not sure I'd know a wolf from a German Shepard if one crossed my path at the information booth in Grand Central.) But let me tell you I'm feeling protectionist fatigue just reading the title of Newsweek's latest cover story: "Beached White Males."
It must be in vogue to champion middle-class Caucasian men as endangered species. Here's what the Newsweek article says:

The same guys who once drove BMWs. . . have now been downsized to BWMs: Beached White Males.

Through the first quarter of 2011, nearly 600,000 college-educated white men ages 35 to 64 were unemployed . . . That’s more than 5 percent jobless—double the group’s pre-recession rate. That might not sound bad compared with the plight of younger, less-educated workers and minorities, but it’s a historic change from the last recession, when about half as many lost their oxford shirts. . . In New York City, men in the 35-to-54 kill zone have lost jobs faster than any other group, including teenage girls. . .

Oh my, teenage girls beating out middle-aged, white men. Who knew they were competing for the same jobs at American Apparel and Wendy's?

In a way, the Newsweek story is yet another take on Hanna Rosin's article ("The End of Men") in The Atlantic last year that predicted the eventual rise of women in the workforce. The Newsweek piece, though, kicks up the end-of-masculinity hysteria another notch--what it calls "the psychic toll of the Mancession." The piece cautions:

It might be tempting to snark at these former fat cats suffering lean times. But when Beached White Males suffer, so do their wives and children. Lives, marriages, and futures are at stake. Examining who these guys are, and what washed them up, is not an exercise in schadenfreude. It's a cautionary tale. To quote Arthur Miller on the most famous Beached White Male, "Attention must be paid."

Though the Newsweek piece didn't say it in so many words, it suggests that white men were being replaced by women--especially their wives--on the workfront, and that's what causing this "stain on your masculinity for becoming the bread-loser." (Hey, anyone notice that those guys are lucky to have working wives who can support them? Would it enhance their masculinity if the whole family starved?)
In any case, Newsweek must be way ahead of the curve, because last time I looked, white guys still seem in charge. That's certainly the case in the legal profession, where women and minorities didn't fare so well during the recession. In fact, white men rule in most professions--including journalism, I might add (though Tina Brown now heads Newsweek).
Please, can we stop putting white men in the endangered category?

Unquote

White males rule the corporate world, the government, the judiciary, the military and so on.
White males still live in privilege, white males still oppress women and girls.  These white male businessmen are known for finding prostitutes and raping them both at home and abroad where access to underage girls is a lot easier.

So, can we please stop concentrating on the privilege strait white male and actually start concentrating on people are are actually oppressed.

All those racist and sexist pigs who want to blame Israel for all the worlds problems need to look in a mirror

 

Picture from here:
http://richardmillett.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/as-israelis-bury-their-dead-scenes-from-london/

Now I am more convinced then ever that the UK is one of the most fucked, racist and sexist places on the planet.

I remember seeing on the news a deadly attack that took place in southern Israel that involved a bus and a private car been attacked by terrorists which were on their way to the costal resort of Eilat. 

Shortly after this horror I see a huge demonstration outside the Israeli embassy in London.  Some of these ass wipe demonstrators calling for the destruction of Israel.

All I could think of was that while the people of Israel were burying their dead these ass wipes are calling for more destruction and death.

If you wanted to have a comparison of Israel vs. her neighbors you may be interested to know that Israeli women enjoy far more rights then in countries like Jordan and Syria etc.  These countries don’t understand true democracy let alone women’s rights.  In fact women and children are getting a real bad deal at the moment in Syria thanks to that Bashar al-Assad character, yet surprisingly no demonstrators outside the Syrian embassy in London. 

I guess in the minds of these sexist freaks, Syrian women and girls are not important and it is ok that they are been murdered and raped in their own homes or forced into exile into neighboring countries after losing their homes, livelihoods and family.  And who is causing all these horrors for them?  Their own countryMEN.

I also guess that in the minds of these sexist freaks, the fact that women and girls are oppressed and seen as third class citizens in the Gaza strip while in Israel they are afforded far more respect means absolutely fuck all.

Well let me tell you what these fuckers are doing.  They are causing the world to ignore the suffering of women and girls in places like Gaza, Syria, Iran etc and get us to focus all our energy on Israel which does not even come near to achieving the horrors of the countries I have just mentioned.  So these fucking sexist British pigs (and foreigners) who formed part of this demo would gladly see the destruction of Israel which gives more freedom to its women then any other country in that region and at the same time support the Gaza’s of the world that sees women as nothing short of fuck objects for its men.

Clearly the lives of women and girls mean nothing when it comes to these assholes political objectives.

I also think what pissed me off even more were the number of women who participated in this demo.  Women are suffering all over the world, so stop always picking on a tiny little nation and start seeing what is really happening in many of the world’s larger nations. And let’s not forget that many of these demonstrators are strong supporters of male supremacy.  So look at your own sexism and racism before you spew all your hatred out at some other nation and accuse them of doing what you are doing.

White male immigrants

The following article has being taken from the following web site:

http://www.radioaustralia.net.au/pacbeat/stories/201109/s3310423.htm

NZ Maori academic wants restictions on white migrants

Updated September 5, 2011 16:54:06

There have been calls for a controversial maori academic in New Zealand to be sacked, after she called for restrictions on white immigration.

Professor Margaret Mutu, head of Maori Studies at Auckland University, said white immigrants from countries like South Africa, Britain and the United States could have racist ideas about white supremacy. There's been a lot of opposition to her comments, including from within Maoridom. Margaret Mutu made her comments in an interview with New Zealand's Sunday Star Times newspaper. She was commenting on a Labour Department survey showing that Maori were more likely than other New Zealanders to harbour anti-immigration views.

END

This article could not help me but wonder about other countries like the US, UK etc.

When white males immigrate into a country like the US they receive top jobs with a high salary and much power.

When women of colour immigrate into the US they are seen as liabilities to the state, they receive no support and often find themselves joining the poverty group.

White male immigrants not only take up all the top jobs that could also have been offed to women of colour but also have no trouble joining the local white male population in oppressing the women and people of colour in that country.

Clearly white male supremacists are welcomed with open arms into countries like the US and UK and gladly continue their oppression of women and people of colour.

Why is prostitution glamorised?

This is a question I have being asking myself a great deal lately. The fact that I am even able to consider this question lends to the fact as to just how selfish male domination is. For only under a male dominated society could a profession like prostitution be allowed to grow and develop like it has in our current day and age.


Many prostitutes come from extremely poor back grounds, many of these young girls have been oppressed by their own fathers, some even sold into prostitution by these men who are suppose to be protecting them.


Many non-white girls are tricked by slavers into coming to places like the US, UK and Europe with promises of becoming models or the like. These young girls are living in third world counties with very little prospects for a bright future. So they gladly accept the offer, firmly believing that they are set to finally make something of their lives.


Once they arrive at their new destination, their passports are taken away from them and they become sex slaves to serve the sexual desires of the male population.


These girls are treated extremely badly, both by the men who enslave them and their male clients.


And this is suppose to be glamorous. Whoever said prostitution is empowering for women and girls seriously needs to get their heads examined.


Prostitution exists as a major industry because the male population demands it. And as the males rule the world, what the males demand the males get.


While these men are sticking their disgusting cocks into these girls, they don't care if these girls are underage, or how they where brought here or how they are being treated. These men only care about having their own disgusting sexual lusts satisfied.


Prostitution proves that men see women and girls as nothing short of property. It is men who sell these girls services to other men. Thus prostitution is a male run business whereby the women and girls are the merchandise.
The male sellers make money off the women and the male buyers get to use and abuse these women as they see fit.

Fairy tales support white male supremacy

Thanks to fairy tales women are inadvertently raising their daughters as slaves to white male supremacy. I am fascinated by how little thought goes into fairy tales that we traditionally love reading to our your young daughters. We never seem to think about what the underlining message in each of these myths is and how it is fashioning the minds of young girls.

If you get over that oh-its-so-romantic stage and start to evaluate these myths with a critical feminist eye, you start to realise just how sexist and racist these so called innocent fairy tales are.

Lets take a look at Cinderella, probably one of the most famous and well known of fairy tales. For those who ask "how is this sweet romantic story suppose to be sexist and racist?"
I would say, rather ask the question "how is it not?"

Lets take a brief look at the story. Our heroin is a young girl who is clearly pure of heart. What self respecting mother would not want a daughter like that. Problem here is, she is all so door mat. She is weak and unable to do much about the abuse she receives from her step mother and sisters.

This is already sending out a clear message. Good girls are door mats. Girls will grow-up believing they must treat men with respect, while it is perfectly acceptable for men to treat them as badly as they like. Good girls must just accept this abuse and carry on being submissive.

I have always found it both interesting and disturbing that the antagonists in fairy tales are always female. They are usually evil witches or family members.
In this case they are the evil step mother and sisters. When you look at stats concerning abuse, this scene would be far more realistic if it was an evil step father and brothers. But that cant happen in fairy tales because in fairy tales men are always the good guys. The powerful white male always comes at the end and saves the poor girl from all these evil females and even from herself because she is just too weak and pathetic to do anything for herself.

This kind of message is clearly making young girls believe that their biggest enemy is not boys or men even if these boys and men are abusive but in actual fact girls.

A girl must believe that males are her saviours while females want to mistreat her and oppress her.

One of the reasons why white male supremacy as well as male supremacy is so strong, is because women are so divided. They are more concerned with watching each other then keeping focused on the real problem i.e. male supremacy.

Of course there is the fairy god mother who helps Cinderella. But what is she really helping Cinderella do? Males see women and girls as property and sex objects. The fairy god mother is helping Cinderella become the property and and sex toy of the prince who is the mighty white male who rules the land. The prince only becomes interested in her because of her looks. And then goes hunting for her so he can bag her and bring her back to his palace where she will serve him as his property and satisfy his sexual urges.

We need to get these types of sexist and racist stories out of circulation. It is time feminists started creating feminist fairy tales. Ones that teach young girls about the dangers of male supremacy and at the same time inspire them to take a stand against it.

If it was up to me, Cinderella would be living with her evil step father and brothers, this would demonstrate to young girls what male supremacy results in. The fairy god mother would be a radical feminist who would also be leader of a militant feminist movement who's aim would be to totally destroy male supremacy. She would inspire and help Cinderella to deal effectively with the evil males in her life. Like beating the shit out of them.

As a collective they would would overthrow the racist and sexist prince. Take over the land and destroy all forms of sexism and racism.

Get the facts first

I have been receiving e-mails about Catherine Kieu Becker, the 48 year old woman who got arrested for cutting off her husband’s penis after she had drugged him, tied him to the bed, cut his penis off and then thrown it down a garbage disposal.

I have noted that women are quite divided on this issue.  Some have been very approving even setting up Catherine Kieu Becker fan pages on Facebook.

Sharon Osbourne in her talk show had a laugh at the man’s expense, saying that she thinks “it’s quite fabulous”, after admitting that she doesn’t know the circumstances or why he filed for divorce. She also referred to it as “hysterical”.

Then there are women who are totally disgusted by what happened.

So, what should a feminist take be on an event like this?  Well, a feminist should not make anything of it until she knows the full facts.

If this woman did it out of shear malice then she needs to have the full might of the law thrown at her.  Feminism is not about siding with criminals just because they are women.  If we feminists are supporting female crimes against men then clearly we have lost the plot and need to take sometime out to figure what it is that we are suppose to be trying to achieve. 

Feminism is about women taking responsibility for their own lives not about becoming demonic ass holes. 

So my advice to the Sharon Osborns of the world are “get the facts before you start passing judgment!!!!  Its women like you who enable men to claim we are too emotional and hysterical to be taken seriously.”

On the other hand I do believe that this event should re-focus us on domestic violence and martial rape.  Because it happens so often we tend to NOT be horrified and disturbed by it as much as we should.  In fact for many, it’s just become part of life.

We do know that in Becker’s case they were going through a divorce so something was amiss in that marriage.

In fact it is a known case that many women in jail today who committed a violent act against a husband or boyfriend were been continuously abused.  These women just couldn’t take it any longer and something inside of them just snapped. 

What has always appalled me is that these women were acting in self defense and are now being punished for trying to either protect themselves or their children.  But that is the price you have to pay when you are a woman living in a male dominated world.

The world is run by men which means that the laws are created by men for men.  The laws are not created to protect women and girls in anyway, but rather to keep them living in fear and under male authority.

The US and UK are strait white male controlled societies which explains why we see so few white males in prison for abusing women.  Often when these white males do end up in prison, it is when they have committed a crime against a woman who belongs to another white male and now this white male wants them in jail for raping or abusing his property.

But at the same time let’s not forget that domestic violence and martial rape is also rampant in non-white countries such as in Asia and Africa where non-white males still see women and girls as nothing greater than a piece of property that can be treated in any manner the male deems appropriate.

In the case of marital rape and domestic abuse I would say an incident like Becker’s would be nothing short of self defense and in that case I would say she deserves the support of feminists and women as a whole.

So instead of judging a specific event that we don’t fully understand, let’s rather use this as an opportunity to re-dedicate ourselves in the fight against male privilege and supremacy because until such time as male supremacy is totally destroyed, women and girls will continue to be raped and abused and the perpetrators will go unpunished.  And when women do take the law into their own hands to try and protect themselves they will be the ones who will be punished.